
16 Nov 2009
So Who is Going Where? F1 Silly Season!

3 Nov 2009
End of Year Report 2009
2 Nov 2009
Team Mate Showdown - Abu Dhabi 2009
29 Oct 2009
10 Changes F1 needs Part 2
5 – Make the drivers earn their money
Now I am not saying line all tracks with concrete walls, and turn the tracks into a death trap. No, what I am saying is stop paving the areas surrounding the track to give drivers and easy way out if they make a mistake. F1 cars are safe, and will continue to get safer under the supervision of the FIA, but the tracks now are being neutered beyond all belief. If a driver falls of the track, he just drives back on. No time lost, in fact, sometimes gaining time and places. If there was a gravel trap at the bus stop at Spa 2008, Hamilton wouldn't have been so keen to cut the chicane. If there was gravel on the outside of La Source at Spa 2009, Raikkonen wouldn't have pointed his car in the general direction of Eau Rouge and floored it past 4 cars.
Look at the last race in Suzuka. The session was stopped 3 times because the drivers couldn't keep it on track. Has the quality of drivers declined? No, they have just become used to the miles of tarmac that allows them to run wide and not lose time. At Suzuka, you run wide and you have a meeting with a tyre barrier. And that is how it should be. . If you are worth your money you can push and not end up buried in a tyre wall. The driver's earn multiple millions of dollars, but they complain if a tyre barrier is within 400 metres of the track, to me, that is a bit pansy.
Oh and another thing, rolling starts for the lightest drop of rain? Please. The drivers in 1990 could manage it with significantly more power, less grip, and less safety precautions, so why are we forced to watch 40 minutes of safety car leading the way for a slight drizzle? If you are scared to crash, you are not pushing hard, and you are not a racing driver.
4 – No team left behind
We want F1 to be a close, and fair, racing series. I also admit that F1 spends way too much, and it is unsustainable in the current economic environment. However, what annoys me is the attitude that Ferrari and Mclaren have to dumb down their technology so that teams like Toro Rosso can keep up and don't have to spend much. Really, the Mclaren engine is superior to the others cause of some reliability upgrades they got through the engine upgrading ban. So the small teams complain, and say they don't have enough power, and the FIA makes Mercedes detune their engine. So basically, the teams spend their money to upgrade the car; the smaller teams can't and complain. Sorry, but if you don't have the money, why are you in F1? It's turning into a school system now: "Sorry Mclaren and Ferrari, but we can't let you win, because the others will feel bad."
Limit F1 teams to 250 Million a year, 40 million was a stupid number, then open up the restrictions. If a team can't afford 250 million, shut up, and find the money. It's the pinnacle of motorsport, not scrapheap challenge. I really don't want to see 24 spec cars. It's just not F1.
3 – Testing ban is pointless
This carries on from the money issue. Teams are not allowed to test during the season to save money. Really? That's stupid, you spend 18 weeks at a race track carting equipment around, but you can't spend 4 days every now and again at Silverstone, or Barcelona? It also means we have drivers thrown into F1 cars, Buemi and Alguersuari are the main culprits, with barely an experience. Toro Rosso is basically a test team Red Bull carries around looking for the next wonder kid Vettel or Hamilton. If we still had testing, it would be safer, and allow young drivers a better chance at succeeding in F1.
2 – Stop with the Scandals.
Any publicity is good publicity! No, it's not; it just makes our beloved sport look stupid. We've had Mclaren caught with Ferrari data, which was bad but ok teams are competing against each other it's expected, they were stupid to get caught! We've also had the President of the FIA caught in a sex scandal, Renault being caught race fixing, comments about Hitler, and much more.
F1 should be known primarily for first class, close, safe, respectable racing. Not for being caught up in scandal after scandal after scandal. The only time my friends have asked me about F1 is when they heard about the Piquet Jnr race fixing incident. How bad does it make a passionate F1 fan feel to have their great sport laughed at cause of the actions of a select few? It feels bad. F1 is a sport that has such a great history with legends such as Fangio, Senna, Clark, Giles Villeneuve, Moss, Schumacher, and Prost driving and battling it out, and it's in the process of being destroyed cause of an era of utter stupidity.
1 – Please sir can I have some more?
Yes, we F1 fans need more overtaking. We all moan about it, we all crave it, and even with the best intentions of the overtaking group, we are still cruelly deprived of any sort of passing. Why? Well we all know about the dirty air that drivers complain about, but what can be done about it? Obviously I am no expert, but here are my ideas.
- Reduce front wing width by 10% - this will make the cars less aero dependent
- Allow a certain amount of down force to be generated by ground effects – this means cars can follow without losing so much down force
- Increase engine power – drivers getting out of shape coming out of a corner, or having the balls to keep his foot down. It should increase overtaking
- Redesign the tracks with fast flat out ballsy corners, into a chicane, like Eau Rouge into Le Combes , or Blancimont into Bus stop.
- RPM limit ruins slipstreaming. Get rid of it
28 Oct 2009
10 Changes F1 needs Part 1
10 – Ticket Prices
The fans are what keep Formula One going. They are incentive for the car manufacturers to poor billions of dollars into designing 2 cars. They are why companies pay millions to get sponsors on the cars, and around the track. Yet the fans are still treated poorly.
A ticket to watch the Spanish Grand Prix in the grand stand seating section, for practice sessions, qualifying, and the race, will cost me $665. That is ridiculous. Only rich people can afford that… Which I think is the reason why it’s so expensive. F1 has a certain amount of snobbery about it, and by charging a stupid price for a grand stand ticket the rich can keep the middle classes away from them in the cheaper parts of the track. When I say cheaper, I mean the cheapest part of the track is $140, and you sit on a grass bank. On the other hand $650 will get you a penthouse suite for the Indy 500 weekend.
Why on earth are we paying that much! It makes no sense! You know what else does not make sense? A track like Barcelona can sell out with 140,000 people in attendance, and still struggle to break even. Why is that? Well we know why, but I am going be cautious and not go into who and what causes the problem.
9 - Entertainment
This could have gone under ticket prices, but bare with me, I'll explain.
So I decide to splash out on the stupidly priced ticket. I get 3 practice sessions, 45 minutes of qualifying, and a race that lasts 1 hour 30 minutes. Great. Is there any side shows? Well GP2 races, if there is one scheduled, and if your ticket includes it. Concerts? Only in Singapore, but the tickets there are even more expensive.
OK, so you don't really get any extras, how about getting up close to the drivers? Nope. That's not allowed. What about watching a crazy overtaking filled race? Only if you're lucky. Spectacular celebrations? No, has been banned.
What I am saying is, F1 is bland. Compare it to MotoGP and you will see none of the drivers have any personality. One time Lewis Hamilton did a donut in front of the stands at Sliverstone and the forum I posted on nearly exploded with excited. If one donut can cause most the F1 fans to orgasm, imagine what they'd be like if F1 drivers celebrated like MotoGP riders? Of course, some people debated whether Hamilton would get a penalty for such the single donut, which leads me onto:
8- For Gods sake make the rules clear!
Raikkonen jumps around the outside at Spa, Webber jumps around the outside in Singapore: how many get punished? Well one, for arguably the same thing,
It's crazy cause that's all that seems to be discussed nowadays. Never who drove well, but who cocked up. Example:
Forum User One: Raikkonen went off the track and gained an advantage, no penalty!
Forum User Two: I Know right! FIARRI again! F1 is such a FARCE, i hate F1, it sucks.
Forum User Three: He didn't gain an advantage.
Forum User Two: OMG yes he did! Besides if it was Hamilton, they would have banned him for life. FIARRI FARCE!
And so on. This continues until the next race, where the next dubious issue is debated in very much the same form.
The point I'm making is that the FIA need to get some permanent stewards to make the decisions, and have a clear rule book to read. This way we can get past this era of constant bitching and whining.
7 - Engines
Use one engine per race weekend, and it would be fine. None of this 8 engines a season rubbish. At the moment if a driver is in second place, why would they push if their engine has to last another 2 races! It's a great way of killing races, turning F1 into an endurance race spread over 17 different tracks. I want to see balls to the wall, pedal to the metal, until crossing the line! Then if the engine grenades, who cares? It's done it's job, let it go out with a bang.
And another thing, let the engineers develop the engines. The cars are so weak in the power department. Having to handle 1000 horsepower will be a great test of driver skill. 750 horsepower? They barely get to 200 Miles an hour at some tracks. Sure the cornering speed is what makes F1 fast, but if you have them a huge engine they would have more speed down the straight, and have to break earlier for turns, and it might just lead to overtaking. Watching a driver stamp on the gas whilst under pressure and wheel spin, giving the driver behind a nice run on him would also be cool to watch, it rarely happens now.
I miss V10's.
6 - Tracks
Yes, Singapore looks great at night, but you know what else looks good? Two Formula One cars side by side going into a corner, battling each other for position.
That doesn't happen in Singapore.
It doesn't happen in Valencia either. In fact, Valencia doesn't even look nice, so it's a double whammy of rubbish.
Why create a track you can't over take at? We have dumped many great tracks to watch a procession in the dark, or in a dockyard? What about Barcelona? Don't get me started on Hungary.
Or what about these new breed of tracks in China or Bahrain? They have more overtaking than the Tilke Street circuits, but still, bit as much as promised. And they look rubbish: No scenery, no spectators. Great! Forget Imola, lets go to the desert to race in front of no one, on a track with no flow.
We need a few other F1 track designers to the monopoly of Tilke. We need to keep the tracks that made F1 what it is: Monaco, Silverstone, Spa and Suzuka especially, and race in places that has a fan base. Not just cause they are willing to pay a stupid amount of money.
Part 2 coming soon
24 Oct 2009
Todt Wins - Donington Fails
- Changing from Slicks to grooved tyres in 1998.
- Raising front wing height in 2000
- Raising front wing height in 2002
- Raising front wing height in 2005
- 1 Race engines
- v8 engines
- 2 race engines
- 17 races on 8 engines
20 Oct 2009
Team Mate Showdown Brazil
Kovalainen out qualified
Also considering he left the pitlane in front of an on fire Raikkonen, and finished 6 places behind him. Add to that
Winner:
Fisichella VS Raikkonen
Fisichella spun in Qualifying, started dead last, then decided to punt Kovalainen off the track. His team mate pitted for a new wing and a bit of a roasting, and he still finished behind him.
The Ferrari is a hard car to drive, but come on Fisi!
Winner: Raikkonen
Kubica VS Heidfeld
Hairy Heidfeld qualified 19th. Kubica 8th. Kubica claimed a podium, Heidfeld ran out of fuel. Not much to add, except Nick better take his finger out, cause Sauber are not guaranteed a place next year.
Alonso VS Grosjean
Grosjean wasn’t actually that far from Alonso in qualifying, qualifying 13th compared to Alonso’s 10th. Alonso was lucky Kobayashi messed up his final lap, or he wouldn’t have made it into the final session.
Alonso was taken out pretty early on in the race, and Grosjean wasn’t fast, and spent most of the race being over taken. Obviously Alonso would have been in front of Grosjean if he wasn’t taken out.
Winner: Alonso, based on qualifying.
Trulli VS Kobayashi
Kobayashi messed up his final qualifying lap, but he wouldn’t have beaten Trulli. Trulli is a wizard in qualifying. Trulli retired on the first lap and Kobayashi had the most impressive debut this year, keeping Button behind and generally looking in control.
Winner: Kobayashi, Trulli got taken out, but it was his own fault. Alonso was innocent.
Alguersuari VS Buemi
Buemi has come along nicely, and picked up points. Alguersuari is still out of his depth.
Winner: Buemi
Webber VS Vettel
OK, apart from Webber’s move against Raikkonen, he had a pretty good race. Vettel contributed to his downfall by qualifying poorly. His race pace was good, and if he had have been up there at the start, he might have won. But he wasn’t so it don’t matter.
Winner: Webber
Rosberg VS Nakajima
Nakajima saw Kobayashi and saw red. A fellow
Winner: Neither. Rosberg should have qualified higher, Nakajima shouldn’t have rammed Kobayashi.
Sutil VS Liuzzi
Sutil had a stunning qualifying, and was looking good for a decent amount of points. Shame his race was ended on the first lap. Liuzzi didn’t look like doing much all weekend.
Winner: Sutil
Button VS Barrichello
Barrichello went for low fuel glory. He wasn’t fast enough to pull out a gap, and then he got a puncture whilst defending against
Oh, and Button is now a World Champion.
Winner: Button
Brazilian GP Winners & Losers
18 Oct 2009
Post-qualifying car weights - Brazil
2. Webber Red Bull-Renault 656.0
3. Sutil Force India-Mercedes 656.5
4. Trulli Toyota 658.5
5. Raikkonen Ferrari 651.5
6. Buemi Toro Rosso-Ferrari 659.0
7. Rosberg Williams-Toyota 657.0
8. Kubica BMW-Sauber 656.0
9. Nakajima Williams-Toyota 664.0
10. Alonso Renault 652.0
11. Kobayashi Toyota 671.5*
12. Alguersuari Toro Rosso-Ferrari 671.5*
13. Grosjean Renault 677.2*
14. Button Brawn-Mercedes 672.0*
15. Liuzzi Force India-Mercedes 680.0*
16. Vettel Red Bull-Renault 683.5*
17. Kovalainen McLaren-Mercedes 656.5*
18. Hamilton McLaren-Mercedes 661.0*
19. Heidfeld BMW-Sauber 650.5*
20. Fisichella Ferrari 683.5*
* Declared Weight
Brazilian GP Qualifying Report
20 Fisichella 1:40.70319 Heidfeld 1:25.51518 Hamilton 1:25.19217 Kovalainen 1:25.05216 Vettel 1:24.009
1. Barrichello 1:19.576
2. Webber 1:19.668
3. Sutil 1:19.912
4. Trulli 1:20.097
5. Raikkonen 1:20.168
6. Buemi 1:20.250
7. Rosberg 1:20.326
8. Kubica 1:20.631
9. Nakajima 1:20.674
10. Alonso 1:21.422
17 Oct 2009
Saturday Practice Three Results
And even in that short space of time, Romain Grosjean managed to bin it in a most spectacular way. I'll try find a video of that later, but here are the results:
01 N. Rosberg Williams 1:23.182 9 laps02 K. Nakajima Williams 1:23.832 7 laps03 J. Button Brawn GP 1:24.122 6 laps04 F. Alonso Renault 1:24.125 5 laps05 A. Sutil Force India F1 1:24.149 4 laps06 R. Grosjean Renault 1:24.389 5 laps07 S. Buemi Scuderia Toro Rosso 1:24.443 5 laps08 J. Trulli Toyota 1:24.859 5 laps09 N. Heidfeld BMW 1:24.867 5 laps10 M. Webber Red Bull 1:25.440 5 laps11 K. Räikkönen Ferrari 1:25.508 4 laps12 H. Kovalainen McLaren 1:25.685 5 laps13 J. Alguersuari Scuderia Toro Rosso 1:26.224 6 laps14 R. Barrichello Brawn GP 1:26.530 4 laps15 S. Vettel Red Bull 1:27.047 4 laps16 V. Liuzzi Force India F1 1:27.341 4 laps17 L. Hamilton McLaren 1:27.798 4 laps18 G. Fisichella Ferrari 1:29.285 4 laps19 R. Kubica BMW 1:29.895 3 laps20 K. Kobayashi Toyota 1:30.259 4 laps
